default-logo
BRE Buzz

Discover, learn and share your thoughts

In the last budget, the Chancellor continued the Governments drive for greater density of housing because people want to live in urban areas and close to work.  With the London Plan (currently under consultation) the Mayor also wants to encourage greater density.

There are benefits of high density housing, it is easier to connect to infrastructure particularly rail, shops and community facilities potentially meaning people who live there are less reliant upon the personal car.   It usually means that the amount of land used per home is less, which as the Chancellor pointed out helps to protect the Green Belt.

For much of the last 15 years I’ve lived in various reasonably high density areas in central London and there are some real benefits; there are always things to do, always people to see and we seem to be able to access services, shops etc. in a more flexible way (being able to just turn up and see a doctor on a bank holiday is useful with a baby…).  It has also meant that my commute to work can be reasonably short (in the past anyway).

However, there are Environmental, Technical, Health and Wellbeing challenges associated with building higher density homes.  In order for them to be high quality, the standards need to be set higher.  Building a self-contained home with its own four walls and a roof, set on its own patch of land, while not simple, has fewer considerations than homes that are close to each other.

If high density homes are also marketed / promised (by government) to be high quality homes, this is likely to raise the expectations of those who live in them.  Therefore, shiny bathrooms and slick kitchens may not be enough if you can constantly hear the music from the 24-hour gym downstairs or you can’t cook in the summer because it makes the flat unbearably hot.

There is a greater consideration to be made to a number of technical areas that impact the occupant’s health and wellbeing and their surrounding environment.

Space is the first consideration when it comes to high density housing.  Numerous studies have shown that humans do need a certain amount of space to be active, healthy and store their belongings.  Personally, I don’t think this has to be always private within the flat, but only under the right circumstances (and this is what is difficult to decipher).  Children, in particular, shouldn’t have to grow up in a small flat, but when I was in my 20s I would have always (and did) trade space inside the flat for a good location.  My dinky flat near Golden Square, Soho was a great basis for life then. My flatmate and I viewed Golden Square or St James’s park as our backyards, but it wouldn’t work for me now.  Space needs to be a balance, and it needs to be communicated to those that live in the property.  In the Home Quality Mark, we plan, as set out in the consultation, that in order to receive 3 or above in the Health and Wellbeing indicator, both internal and recreational space must be addressed.

Sound – Simply being closer, or having buildings connected to infrastructure (i.e. railway stations), entertainment and more means the risk of health implications of not being able to rest properly is increased.  Understanding, then isolating the home from these external risks is key for a good night’s sleep.  Isolating homes from external sounds also allows existing sites of importance to carry on as they were. The music industry has warned of venues closing down if new homes located close by are not isolated from the sound properly.  High density shouldn’t lead to a cultural vacuum (in fact the opposite should be true).   https://news.sky.com/story/beatles-icon-sir-paul-mccartney-the-future-of-music-is-in-danger-11201975

Equally, people don’t want noisy ventilation fans that are either inaccurately designed (too small fans, or small ducting that doesn’t allow enough air to pass through it).  Indoor Air Quality and comfort is also more difficult in high density developments.  People may not be able to leave their windows open (due to height, external noise, security etc.) which may mean the need for other systems to ensure adequate ventilation.  As well as ensuring this ventilation is designed correctly early on (we have seen some instances where it has impacted planning due to the need to increase the size ducting or grills) it needs to be a system that can be maintained (filters changed etc.) over its lifetime.  As there is often more building to space ratio in high density dwelling, developers also need to choose their building products carefully so there is limited impact on indoor air quality.   These are all key issues that are taken into consideration in the Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality issue of Home Quality Mark.

In the summer (I know that seems like a long time ago at the moment…), high density homes are more likely to be too warm for occupants.  With greater levels of hard building materials around it is more difficult for the heat to reduce at night, meaning over prolonged periods of hot weather homes get hotter and hotter. People may also not be able to leave windows open due to noise, security or air pollution. Careful consideration of shading, ventilation, and inclusion of green / natural areas can help keep the temperatures acceptable.   Going forward, with a changing climate we should expect more hotter days, which means making buildings more resilient more important.

Building to higher density can have impacts upon ecology, while not impossible, it certainly takes more thought to include green space and areas for flora and fauna to thrive.  These then have to be maintained.  Good Ecology is important, not only for our natural environment but also for our own health and wellbeing.  It can also help with technical issues, such as temperature control of the building and reducing the amount of water runoff from the site.

Often all these challenges may mean that a different way of construction may need to be used, perhaps more of the building constructed in a factory or other modern methods.

There are now a number of helpful guides that help with the planning aspects of developments to ensure that they are healthy for many generations of occupants to come.  UKGBC’s Health Homes report and more recently TCPA’s practical Guide on Health in Garden Cities.

High density homes can be good quality homes, but more thought has to be put into them, it is also difficult to achieve all the different aspects on all the units within a block / development.  Different units will be better at different things.  This is why standards such as the Home Quality Mark which takes into account technical and environmental issues should be considered when planning and delivering high density developments.  It also rates the individual unit so future householders can clearly understand the benefits of their home.

Gwyn Roberts
About the Author
Homes and Communities Leader, at BRE Global. I lead the team who works on Home Quaility Mark, BREEAM Communities, BREEAM Domestic Refurbishment and the Code for Sustainable Homes. Ex DCLG civil servant consultant and independent traveller; crossing Africa in a Solar powered Landcruiser in 2009/10. @homeqm and @overlandsun
  1. Pingback: BRE Buzz » Making 300 000 new homes a year, happy healthy places to live – Live Gossips

Comment on this Story

*

captcha *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.