default-logo
BRE Buzz

Discover, learn and share your thoughts

14 Jun 2017

People expect good natural lighting, both daylight and sunlight, in their homes. In cities, however, external obstructions restrict the amount of light that is available. A BRE publication, ‘Site layout planning for daylight and sunlight: a guide to good practice’ (BRE Report BR209) gives guidance in this area. It explains how to limit the loss of light to existing buildings (especially housing) and how to achieve good levels of light in new developments. Local authorities often use the BRE Report when deciding whether to give planning permission in situations where daylight and sunlight are important.

A recent report ‘Guiding light: unlocking residential density’, written for lobby group London First, critiques the BRE Report and the way its guidance is applied in London. Daylight surveyors GIA, the authors of the report, claim that local authorities use the BRE guidance ‘mechanistically’, preventing high density development. They point out that some historic London streets have higher levels of obstruction, and call for alternative targets in London, although they do not specify what these are.

The BRE Report itself recommends a flexible approach to applying the guidance. Its Introduction states that different target values can be used in historic city centres or areas with modern high rise buildings. An appendix to the guide explains how these can be applied. In our experience, local authorities in London generally use the guidelines appropriately, allowing flexibility in tight urban environments.

GIA argue for density targets to be increased, and used as the basis for reduced daylight recommendations in areas of London. However it is vital that new guidance recognises the human need for natural light, and doesn’t recommend conditions that may have an adverse impact on health. Recent research has shown that daylight is more important than previously recognised. Scientists have discovered sensors in the eye, triggered by daylight, which regulate sleeping and waking and release hormones that help guard against cancer and other diseases. For this reason a new draft European standard on daylight recommends levels that are significantly higher than those in the BRE guidance.

There is an alternative approach, which involves careful daylighting design based around the principles set out in the BRE Report. High density is still possible, but the layout of new homes needs to be planned with care and appropriate window sizes specified. The historic examples cited by GIA often have larger windows on the lower floors which are more heavily obstructed. New developments also need to acknowledge their neighbours’ need for light, avoiding insensitive high rise blocks being built too close to nearby dwellings.

The BRE Report, and a recent publication on ‘Lighting and health’ can be obtained from www.brebookshop.com; and BRE’s daylight and sunlight services are outlined at www.bre.co.uk/daylight-and-sunlight . There is a link to the GIA/London First report at londonfirst.co.uk.

Paul Littlefair
About the Author
Dr Paul Littlefair leads BRE’s lighting team and is the author of 'Site layout planning for daylight and sunlight: a guide to good practice'.
  1. Michael Ney Reply

    Since GIA work mostly for large developers seeking to maximise the footprint and massing of their buildings to increase the profit, they would say that, wouldn’t they? That is not to say that some planning officers do apply the BRE Guide mechanistically rather than thinkingly but using “flexibility” as a means of beating surrounding occupiers into submission also has to be guarded against. Balance and careful judgment is what is called for.

Comment on this Story

*

captcha *